|
Observations
July 4, 2019
|
 |
|

Wingate Lassiter
|
THE EDITOR'S POINT OF VIEW
Not your typical editorial page
is this going to be from now on . . .
I'm a bit disappointed the Sun's "Opinions" page hasn't
attracted any "letters to the editor" since we launched
the Weekly Sun in January. Looks like folks around here
have gotten out of that habit since we've been without a
traditional community newspaper for some time now.
So, I'm going to make this easier for both you the reader
and me the editor.
By re-naming the page "Observations" we expand the limits
of what can be presented here. In addition to conventional
"editorials" from me and "letters" from you, we can share
"short burst" comments about this and that, we can publish
digital photos of just about anything that's interesting
to you and the rest of us, or you can simply raise
questions about local issues and situations that deserve
answers.
The only rule is that whatever is published here must
carry the name of the person who submits it --- and that
must be your real name, not a pseudonym that disguises
one's identity (as they did in the early days of community
journalism).
Let's get started....
Want to compare property-tax rates?
Comparing municipal electric rates is pretty simple: You
pay for what you use.
Comparing municipal property-tax rates is another matter
because property-tax bills depend more on how local real
estate is valued than the tax rate itself.
So, for what it's worth, here's how property-tax rates
stack up for the four Johnston towns that also sell
electricity:
Clayton has the highest rate: 58 cents per $100 valuation
--- left unchanged this year even after upward real-estate
revaluations.
Smithfield is next with a rate of 57 cents --- also
unchanged this year.
Selma's rate, also unchanged, is 54 cents.
Benson's rate is now 53 cents --- down a penny from last
year's 54 cents.
The only fair and realistic way to compare local
real-estate taxes is to find a similar residence in each
of those towns and then calculate the property-tax bill
for each using the county's new "assessed value"
multiplied by the tax rate.
It would be interesting to see the results if someone
wants to go to the trouble of figuring it out....
And now for some "Pictures of the Week"

We've got naturally occurring decorations for the
Fourth of July with Smithfield's red crape myrtles, shown
here in bloom along Bridge Street west of the Post Office.
I'm pretty sure these trees were planted by the town's
Appearance Commission back in the 1970s when an effort was
made to line certain trees with either crape myrtles or
dogwoods or Bradford pears. Many have survived; others
have vanished from view because of storms and/or "survival
of the fittest."

Downtown Smithfield's Sarah Edwards has captured a
number of nifty scenes from her bailiwick that she posts
on Facebook. She got this sunset shot about a week ago on
Market Street near the Courthouse.
|
Got a
comment or a question?
If so, send an e-mail to editor@smithfieldweeklysun.com.
We'll confirm receipt of your correspondence and, if any
or all of it is appropriate for publication, we'll ask
your permission to print before we "go to press." If we
publish your submission, all we will show is your name.
Your e-mail address and place of residence will not be
shared.
To make verification simpler, please sign up as a
subscriber if you haven't already done so, using the
online form below:
|
|
|
|
RETURN
TO THE SMITHFIELD WEEKLY SUN FRONT PAGE |